![]() The post-mortem report detailed Nilsen's cause of death as a pulmonary embolism and retroperitoneal hemorrhage. Nilsen died two days later on May 12, 2018, having served 34 years of his full-life sentence. He was found to have a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm which was repaired but he later suffered a blood clot as a complication of the stomach surgery. Read more Who Was the Real Dennis Nilsen? David Tennant Plays Scottish Serial Killer Nilsen had been serving his life sentence at Her Majesty's Prison Full Sutton when he was taken to hospital on complaining of severe stomach pains. He was 72-years-old at the time of his death. How did Dennis Nilsen die?ĭennis Nilsen died in York Hospital on May 12, 2018. He joined the likes of killers Stephen Port, Christopher Halliwell, and Peter Sutcliffe. Nilsen was one of a growing list of British criminals who have received a whole life tariff, meaning he would never be released from prison. ![]() He was jailed for life in 1983 with a recommendation he serve a minimum of 25 years after being convicted of six counts of murder and two of attempted murder. The documentary features recordings made by Dennis Nilsen from his prison cell, where he details his life and the horrific crimes he committed in the late 1970s and early 1980s.īetween 19, Nilsen, murdered at least 12 young men and potentially many more at two addresses in North London. He’s previously known for Don’t F**k With Cats: Hunting an Internet Killer, another great documentary.Memories of a Murder: The Nilsen Tapes is the latest true-crime documentary on Netflix you do not want to miss. If you recognized the director, Michael Harte, you might expect this. He was a calculated, cruel creep of a man who knew exactly what he was doing.Ĭontent-wise, it is explicit, so there are grueling images and very descriptive language. It becomes clear that Nilsen wanted a trial, he wanted fame and drama. This implies that Nilsen had a very distorted view of himself. Stories like this are so fascinating, but how true are they? In parts of the documentary, we have a police officer talking about Nilsen as a person and then we have Nilsen “typing” on the typewriter, a complete contradiction. Apparently, in the army, he would cover himself with powder and imagine himself as a dead body. ![]() Nilsen was a police officer and he’d been in the army. Whilst this is about Nilsen, we are also given a detailed insight into London in that era.ĭelving into Nilsen’s past, the documentary discusses his childhood and we try to unravel, as we always do, what makes someone a serial killer. However, the way in which this is directed, I would say this is not really about Nilsen’s memories, but memories about Nilsen. It isn’t distracting to the average viewer, but I found it a little over the top and unnecessary. Everyone interviewed is interviewed in dark, dingy rooms, probably to resemble Nilsen’s dark and dank apartment. We hear stories and accounts from police, journalists, survivors, and bereaved families in the documentary, recalling what happened during the investigation. He targeted “rent-boys” and gay men knowing that they would fall into the ether of London. That’s probably one thing that stood out for me and has stayed with me. ![]() Heartbreakingly, a lot of the victims weren’t even recorded missing therefore no one was looking for them. Here, we have a killer who claimed he didn’t know the victims, so the police have to find the identity of the victims. What makes this different or makes it stand out is that usually we have a victim and the hunt is to find the killer. It’s clear he thought himself to be very important and wants to go down as some sort of king in British crime history. In this documentary we hear recordings from cassette tapes Nilsen made in prison, allowing him to narrate and tell his story.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |